第一章绪言：源自环境体认的坐向、朝向和指向 / 001第二章前五帝时代：覆盖东亚大陆腹地核心区的空间互动圈 / 011第三章五帝时代（上）：华夏民族的形成与国家的产生 / 043第四章五帝时代（下）：大型权力单位间的碰撞与协同 / 073第五章夏、商、西周：错综复杂的北上与南下 / 119第六章回响：传统的延续与嬗变 / 163附表本书涉及的遗址要素指向标的被指次数统计表 / 200插图出处 / 217后记 / 231
Contents
Chapter 1 Prologue: Orientation， Direction， and Alignment Derived from Environmental Perception / 001 Chapter 2 The Era Before the Five Emperors: The Spatial Interaction Circle Covering the Core Regions of the East Asian Continent / 011 Chapter 3 The Five Emperors Era (Part Ⅰ): The Formation of the Huaxia Ethnicity and the Emergence of the State / 043 Chapter 4 The Era of the Five Emperors (Part Ⅱ): Clashes and Collaboration Among Large Power Units / 073 Chapter 5 Xia， Shang， and Western Zhou Dynasties: The Intricate
Migrations Among Inhabitants Across Different Regions / 119 Chapter 6 Echoes: The Continuity and Transformation of Tradition / 163 Appendix Statistics on the Frequency of Objectives been Directed at by the
Site Elements Mentioned / 200 Figures References / 217 Epilogue / 231
內容試閱：
系统的测量显示，先秦东亚大陆腹地考古遗址上的主导建筑轴线和圈围段落总是与东亚大陆腹地的高等级神明之隩、设围基址或者旧石器时代的特殊遗址相关。根据人类环境体认习惯，可以认为，这一现象表明，先秦时期东亚大陆腹地存在利用建筑摆布和圈围形态指示相应遗址主张者空间渊源的文化传统。这样的传统使得考古遗址上的营造物，尤其是那些平面形状难以描述的圈围成为了解在东亚大陆腹地活动的人群迁徙与互动的标识系统。
对一定数量人群的空间渊源的确认，不仅大体上勾画了先秦时期东亚大陆腹地主导人群迁徙、互动的基本格局，而且让人看到了：以著名的旧石器时代遗址，如北京房山周口店、山东沂水跋山、湖南道县玉蟾岩为空间渊源的人群，在后世相当长的时间里都是不可忽视的存在；距今 9000年左右，一个大体上覆盖东亚大陆腹地的人群互动圈已经形成；华夏族的产生与国家的出现密切关联；中心位于郑州—洛阳一线的大型权力在“中国”的塑造上占据着特殊的地位；社会条件变化造成的族群空间资本贬值是与祖宗无关的至上神出现的前提；在祭祀活动为国之大事的古代，与祖宗无关的至上神的确立，为“汉族”的出现奠定了基础；虽然《周礼 ·考工记》主张的都城模型影响巨大，但传统的以特殊地点为指向标的的建筑朝向设定与圈围安排规则仍然以法术形式在汉长安乃至其后都城的设置上得以体现。
相关的基础性发现与随之而来的讨论，既可以作为《塑造中国：东亚大陆腹地早期聚落组织与空间架构》一书的支撑，也在相当程度上证实了《史记》，尤其是《今本竹书纪年》的信史性质。
Abstract
Systematic measurements have shown that the architectural axes of functionally dominant buildings and enclosures on archaeological sites in the core regions of the East Asian continent during the Pre-Qin period are consistently associated with high-ranking “deities’ habitations”， enclosures， or special Palaeolithic sites. Based on human environmental perception habits， it can be inferred that this phenomenon indicates the existence of a cultural tradition of utilizing building layouts and enclosure forms to signal the spatial origins of the proponents of a given site. Such traditions turned the constructions on archaeological sites， especially those enclosures with shapes difficult to describe， into a system of markers for understanding the migration and interaction of the populations active in the region.
The extensive verifications of spatial origins of the inhabitants corresponding to archaeological sites not only have roughly outlined the basic patterns of migration and interactions of the dominant inhabitants in the core regions of the East Asian continent during the Pre-Qin period， but also presented the following seven innovative findings.
1. Populations originating from renowned Paleolithic sites—such as Zhoukoudian (Fangshan， Beijing)， Bashan (Yishui， Shandong) and Yuchanyan (Daoxian， Hunan)— remained a significant presence throughout much of later history.
2. Around 9，000 years ago， a spatial interaction network encompassing the hinterlands of the East Asian continent had already been formed.
3. The forming of Huaxia Ethnicity is closely linked to the formation of the state.
4. The large power centers located along the Zhengzhou-Luoyang axis played a critical role in shaping“the central state”.
5. The devaluation of ethnic spatial capital caused by changes in social conditions was the premise for the emergence of supreme deities unrelated to ancestors.
6. In ancient times， when sacrificial rites were of national importance， the establishment of supreme deities unrelated to ancestors laid the foundation for the emergence of the “Han ethnic group”.
7. Although the capital city model proposed in Kaogongji (The Record of Artificers) had a significant influence， the traditional rules for architectural orientation and the arrangement of enclosures were still embodied in the form of magic， as seen in the layout of the Han capital city of Chang’ an and subsequent capital cities.
The connection between the architectural axes and enclosure elements at the Pre-Qin archaeological sites and the“deities’ habitations”and previous important enclosure sites not only serves as a fundamental support for the book Shaping China: Organizational and Spatial Structures of Early Settlements in the Hinterlands of East Asia， but also， to a considerable extent， confirms the historical authenticity of the Records of the Grand Historian， particularly the Bamboo Annals (the new version).
購物車/收銀台(0) | 在線留言板
| 付款方式
| 運費計算
| 聯絡我們
| 幫助中心 |
加入書簽
HOME
新書上架
